Crypto exchanges compared: Gemini, Bybit, Gate and Revolut X
Compare documented fees, access, custody and account controls for Gemini, Bybit, Gate and Revolut X. Public-document review; no product testing.
In this comparison
A documentation-based comparison of account access, trading costs, custody and controls. Information checked on 5 September 2026.
Choosing a crypto exchange is not just a fee comparison. First ask whether the service is available where you live, which company would hold your assets, what the exact order and transfer will cost, and what controls you can enable before sending money.
Our disclosure: zcompound reviewed current public documentation and provider pages only. We did not open or fund accounts, place trades, measure spreads or execution, test deposits or withdrawals, contact support, audit security, or collect original performance data. The four account links below go directly to official provider homepages. zcompound receives no compensation from them as of 5 September 2026; provider eligibility and terms apply.
This comparison does not name a universal winner. It is a starting point in our Crypto & Digital Assets learning path, designed to help you build a smaller, more relevant shortlist.
Snapshot comparison
Scroll sideways or use arrow keys to read the full table.
| Provider | Documented fit | Trading-cost model checked | Custody and controls | Material access caveat |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gemini | Readers in a currently supported country who want a simple quote screen plus a separate order-book interface | Gemini Mode calculates the fee at order time and can include a variable spread; ActiveTrader uses maker/taker tiers | Custodial relationship; Gemini documents required 2FA, hardware-key support and address allowlisting | Gemini says it closed customer accounts in the UK, EEA and Australia effective 6 April 2026 |
| Bybit | Eligible readers who want a large, tiered order-book interface and granular withdrawal controls | Published crypto-to-crypto spot base rate is tiered; Bybit says actual rates may vary by region and account | Custodial account; Bybit documents 2FA, passkeys, anti-phishing code, allowlists and withdrawal-delay options | Bybit's current excluded-jurisdiction list includes the US, mainland China, Hong Kong, Singapore, Canada and others |
| Gate | Readers willing to resolve a region-specific Gate entity before comparing a broad spot interface | Gate publishes VIP maker/taker tiers; a checked regional guide uses 0.1% as a VIP0 taker example | Custodial account; Gate describes multi-factor controls, withdrawal allowlisting, anti-phishing code and security logs | “Gate” is not one global contract: Gate US, EU and other localized services have different access and terms |
| Revolut X | Eligible Revolut users who want a separate order-book interface tied to the Revolut account ecosystem | Checked UK fee page lists 0% maker and 0.09% taker; external withdrawals add a service fee and variable network fee | Provider custody under the applicable local terms; account and bank relationships vary by entity | UK and EEA terms identify different entities and different protection language; availability is country-specific |
Rates and access can change after this review. Never transfer or trade from this table alone.
How we compared
We applied the same seven questions to each provider: eligibility and entity, spot workflow, trading cost, funding and withdrawals, custody, account controls and support, and material usability limits. We used official fee pages, agreements, supported-location pages and help documentation checked on 5 September 2026.1234
We did not score or weight the providers. A “may suit” label describes the public workflow, not suitability for you. Published controls are also not proof that a control worked in every incident. The same seven-question method is applied to every provider in this comparison.
Gemini
May suit readers in a supported country who want a quote-led interface and a separate order-book option.
Gemini publishes different pricing for different interfaces. Its Gemini Mode page says the transaction fee is calculated at order time and may vary with the payment method, order size, market conditions, jurisdiction, asset and other costs. Instant, recurring and conversion quotes can include a spread. ActiveTrader instead uses maker/taker tiers based on trailing 30-day volume or asset balance.56
Why it may fit: the separation between a simple trade-review screen and an order-book schedule is explicit. Gemini also publishes a legal agreement, asset-support table, security page and support center.
Pros: interface-specific fee documents; pre-confirmation price and fee review; provider-documented required 2FA, hardware-key support and withdrawal-address allowlisting.7
Cons: similar Gemini Mode transactions can have different fees or spreads; ActiveTrader's lowest published tier is not the entry tier; crypto deposits and withdrawals still depend on the exact asset and supported network. Gemini says support is email-based rather than phone-based.
Geography, entity and custody: Gemini's current availability page says accounts in the UK, EEA and Australia were closed effective 6 April 2026, even though those locations remain displayed lower on the same page. Its U.S. Gemini Trust agreement describes an exchange custody relationship, but the applicable Gemini entity and product terms depend on the account.89 Confirm the live country list, agreement, asset, network and withdrawal conditions before depositing.
Bybit
May suit eligible readers who want a tiered spot order book and configurable withdrawal controls.
Bybit's current trading-fee structure uses maker/taker tiers. Its table shows a 0.1000% maker and 0.1000% taker base rate for VIP 0 crypto-to-crypto spot pairs, but the same page explicitly says actual rates may vary by region and directs verified users to “My Fee Rate.” Fiat pairs and special trading zones have separate tables.2
Bybit says it charges no platform fee for on-chain crypto deposits or internal transfers, while an on-chain withdrawal fee depends on the selected coin and chain and appears in the withdrawal window. Payment-provider and fiat-method fees can apply, and methods vary by country.10
Why it may fit: the public documentation separates product fee categories and explains a wide set of account and withdrawal settings.
Pros: published tier mechanics; final account-rate direction; provider-documented 2FA, passkey, fund password, transaction approval, anti-phishing code, withdrawal allowlist, new-address lock and optional withdrawal delay.1112
Cons: the displayed base rate is not a guaranteed account quote; fiat access and provider charges vary; a supported token is not necessarily supported on every network; numerous advanced products can make the interface harder to evaluate if you only need spot trading.
Geography, entity and custody: Bybit's restricted-country page currently includes the United States, mainland China, Hong Kong, Singapore, Canada and other locations, and notes an entity-specific Dubai restriction.13 Do not use a VPN or inaccurate residence information to bypass restrictions. Identify the contracting entity during onboarding and read its custody, complaint and withdrawal terms.
Gate
May suit readers who will first identify the Gate service and entity offered in their region.
Gate publishes tiered spot maker/taker fees and directs signed-in users to their account rate. A regional English help guide checked for this review describes VIP0 through VIP16 and uses a 0.1% VIP0 taker fee in an example; this is evidence of the fee mechanism, not a universal quote.14 Deposit, withdrawal, network, minimum and fiat-rail conditions must be checked in the localized account flow.
Why it may fit: readers who want to compare a broad spot interface can inspect an official fee hub, regional legal agreements, public help resources and granular provider security descriptions.
Pros: documented tier structure; localized agreements; provider-described multi-factor checks, withdrawal allowlisting, anti-phishing code, fund password and security logs.15
Cons: localization makes a generic “Gate fee” or “Gate availability” claim unreliable; product breadth can obscure which service and risk terms apply; marketing statements about rankings or reserves are not treated as independent evidence here.
Geography, entity and custody: Gate US has a separate U.S. agreement, while Gate's EU agreement lists the US and many other locations as restricted for that service.1617 Those statements are not contradictory once the entity and regional site are separated. Follow the official regional route, confirm the company named in your agreement, and check supported assets, networks, transfer status and account limits before funding.
Revolut X
May suit eligible Revolut users who want an order-book interface within the broader Revolut account ecosystem.
Revolut X documents market and limit orders in a separate crypto-exchange interface. Its checked UK fee page lists 0% maker and 0.09% taker fees. External withdrawals add a Revolut service fee—listed as £1 equivalent for a named group of assets and £3 equivalent for others—plus a variable network fee shown before submission.4 Because that is a UK page, readers elsewhere must open their local version rather than importing the figure.
Why it may fit: the fee schedule is short, and the terms distinguish order-book trades from a separate Convert feature. The product can move money through the applicable Revolut bank-account relationship, subject to local terms.
Pros: clearly stated maker/taker model on the checked page; market and limit orders; public UK and EEA legal versions; provider support through the Help Centre and in-app chat.18
Cons: the exchange is tied to other Revolut accounts and terms; Convert is a distinct product with different execution and pricing; external withdrawals cost more than the trading fee alone; support and security were not tested.
Geography, entity and custody: the UK terms identify Revolut Ltd, while the Ireland/EEA terms identify Revolut Digital Assets Europe Ltd and say the EEA service is regulated in Cyprus under MiCA. The EEA terms also say the service is not covered by the Cyprus Investor Compensation Fund; the UK terms carry separate UK protection warnings.1920 Read the version presented to you and confirm the custody entity, account relationship and country availability.
Crypto and exchange risk box
An exchange account normally creates third-party-custody dependence: the provider, and sometimes a subcustodian, controls systems needed to hold or return assets. The SEC's investor-education staff explains that wallets manage credentials such as private keys rather than storing coins themselves; third-party custody therefore adds legal, operational and recovery questions.21
Crypto prices can fall sharply. An asset can be paused or delisted, a withdrawal can be delayed, a network can be congested, and a transfer on the wrong network may be difficult or impossible to recover. A security feature, regulatory registration, insurance statement or proof-of-reserves publication does not protect against every loss. Crypto protection is not automatically equivalent to bank-deposit insurance or brokerage-custody protection.
Before moving assets, work through our crypto wallet security checklist. For costs, include spreads, payment rails and withdrawal fees—not only the headline trading rate—using our investment-fees framework. If maker and taker terminology is unfamiliar, start with market orders versus limit orders.
Facts to re-check before opening an account
Scroll sideways or use arrow keys to read the full table.
| Check now | Question to answer in the official account flow |
|---|---|
| Residence and eligibility | Is this exact service permitted for my current country, state or territory? |
| Contracting entity | Which company holds the account, and which agreement and complaint route apply? |
| Spot product and order type | Am I using a quote/convert product, market order or limit order? |
| All-in trade cost | What fee and spread appear immediately before I confirm? |
| Deposit and withdrawal | Which fiat rails, coins and networks are live, and what are the fees, minimums and limits? |
| Custody and protection | Who controls the keys, can a subcustodian be used, and which losses are explicitly excluded? |
| Account controls | Can I enable strong 2FA or passkeys, anti-phishing codes, address allowlists and withdrawal delays before funding? |
| Support and recovery | Which verified support route handles a locked account or delayed transfer, and what identity checks are required? |
Alternatives
You can also investigate a locally regulated exchange not included here, a broker offering limited crypto exposure, or self-custody after learning the operational responsibilities. These are different products—not automatic upgrades in safety or cost. A local exchange may provide a clearer legal route but fewer assets; a broker may simplify exposure but limit withdrawals; self-custody removes one custodian while making you responsible for keys and recovery.
Sources
- Gemini fees overview
- Bybit trading fee structure
- Gate fee schedule
- Revolut X exchange fees
- Gemini fee schedule
- Gemini ActiveTrader fee schedule
- Gemini security
- Gemini availability
- Gemini Trust user agreement
- Bybit fee guide
- Bybit account security
- Bybit withdrawal security
- Bybit restricted countries
- Gate spot trading fees
- Gate security
- Gate US user agreement
- Gate EU user agreement
- Revolut X setup guide
- Revolut X UK terms
- Revolut X EEA terms
- Crypto asset custody basics for retail investors